The collaboration tool that I explored this week was a tool used by many, wikis! I used to think negatively about using wikis to support learning because I have always been told to never cite Wikipedia as a source. However, for personal curiosities I would always look for answers on Wikipedia and learn a lot. I think because a wiki can be edited by just about anyone gives it both advantages and disadvantages. I think the advantage of wikis is the sharing of information between such a large range of people. I also enjoy the way that we use wikis in this course to share our blog, twitter, pinterest, e-mails, etc. I've also noticed how careful you must be not to accidentally delete what others have shared! As for a disadvantage, the greatest disadvantage I think we all can agree on would be the credibility of the information that is being shared. People could type incorrect or improper information on wikis. With this being said, I think wikis are a great hub of information but once reading something, I suggest to look elsewhere to verify the information you have found. This reminds me week 4 when we learned about the importance of the reliability and validity of sources we use online. Maybe when using wikis you can try out the methods we learned about which are the TRASH, or Internet Detective method.
The blog post Wikis- wickedly clever, underused learning tool expresses the vast potential that wikis have to support learning. What I found most appealing about this blog was suggesting students to participate on Wikipedia and identify where it lacks credibility and actually edit the wiki to improve its weaknesses. I've only ever used this wiki for research, actually collaborating and editing sounds very intriguing! Have any of you contributed to Wikipedia?
The blog post Wikis- wickedly clever, underused learning tool expresses the vast potential that wikis have to support learning. What I found most appealing about this blog was suggesting students to participate on Wikipedia and identify where it lacks credibility and actually edit the wiki to improve its weaknesses. I've only ever used this wiki for research, actually collaborating and editing sounds very intriguing! Have any of you contributed to Wikipedia?
![]() |
| Polecrone, B. (CC) 2016. |
My Feedly read this week did not disappoint; it never does! This week I stumbled upon a great read yet again. Lately I've been thinking about what I'm going to do next year when I graduate, and eventually the thought of interviews popped in my head. I don't have much experience with interviews so I found this article very appealing. Obviously in an interview you want to stand out from others who are going for the same position. The article Saying you're passionate is pretty cliche- go with this instead gives great ideas of alternative ways to express yourself and rephrase the typical lines interviewers hear all the time! Do any of you have interview experience? Do you have any suggestions on how to prepare?

Hi Brooke,
ReplyDeleteI thought negatively of wikis before this session as well! In high school we were always told not to use resources coming from a wiki as they are not always accurate. Through this session I am learning the good part of wiki's which is awesome and your post is just enlightening me more on the topic!
Thanks,
Julia